Like several other German managers, Hansi Flick is also known for his aggressive, high-pressing approach, but against strong sides, he opts for a compact defensive block. Experienced managers have to make a tactic shift every game, and this adjustment helps the team maintain a proper structure, this minimises defensive risks and is beneficial for counter-attacks up front. Let’s take a look at why Flick prefers a compact defensive block against strong opponents.
Limits Space for Opposition PLAY-MAKERS
Strong teams usually have creative play-makers up front, these play-makers often thrive in spaces left behind in defence. A compact block ensures that lines between midfield and defence remain closed, this reduces passing lanes and minimises gaps in defence which the opponent can attack freely. The block mainly remains inside the box, this forces the opponents to play from wide, where attacking opportunities are less of a threat.
ProtectiON IN the Middle of the Pitch
One of the key features of this block is to control the central areas of the field. When the team remains in a compact and organised fashion, this prevents opponents from breaking through the middle. This forces the attacks to be played from wide areas, and long shots, both of which are easier to take care of.
Defensive Solidity
A compact defensive block ensures multiple layers of protection for the goal. When the defence presses high against the opponents, there is always the risk of a through ball being played in large spaces left behind. When the defence sits behind in a compact manner, Flick’s team minimises defensive openings, making it difficult for opponents to find a chance.
Quick Transition Play
Flick prefers quick transitions over possession-based football. A compact defensive block helps the team recover the ball in deep areas overloading the areas, this sets up counter-attacking opportunities through explosive runs from behind. We have seen this being done by Balde a lot. When the ball is won, due to the compact formation quick passing is done to exploit spaces left by opposition defences.
Forcing Poor Conversion Rate Shots
When a defensive block is set up, the compactness minimises the opposition’s chances of keeping the possession near the box. This forces the opponents to opt for long-range shots from outside the box. These shots are often very weak or taken from a very tight angle, reducing the risk of scoring.
Conclusion
Flick’s decision to opt for a compact defensive block against stronger opponents is a tactical shift that balances defensive stability with counter-attacking threats. With the spaces being limited, and central areas fully protected, this ensures defensive stability. This makes it difficult for opponents to break through Flick’s defence.